Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Using discovery process and accumulation volumetric models to improve petroleum resource assessment in Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic Archipelago

By
Zhuoheng Chen
Zhuoheng Chen
Search for other works by this author on:
Kirk G. Osadetz
Kirk G. Osadetz
Geological Survey of Canada, Calgary 3033 33rd Street, NW Calgary, AB, Canada T2L 2A7
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2011

Abstract

Sverdrup Basin hosts a structural petroleum play in Mesozoic clastic reservoirs. Twenty-one discovered fields (eight crude oil and 25 natural gas pools) have 294.1×106 m3 crude oil, and 500.3×109 m3 natural gas, original in-place contingent resources. We discuss and compare discovery process and volumetric assessment methods that, respectively, predict a 673.1×106 m3 or 698.7×106 m3 median crude oil resource and a 1187.4×109 m3 or 1202.8×109 m3 median natural gas resource. Both methods predict that the largest crude oil and third-largest natural gas pools are undiscovered, a result inferred to be consistent with available data and the exploration history. Volumetric assessments can precede any discoveries and they use common geoscience data inputs; however, they can be affected by data interdependencies and biases from exploratory sampling and subjective parameter estimates, particularly those affecting the number of accumulations. Discovery process methods solve for the accumulation numbers and size distribution simultaneously, accounting for sampling bias and free of data interdependencies, but only once sufficient discoveries exist. The Sverdrup Basin dataset and exploration history permit us to cross-validate volumetric and discovery process assessments and validate their predictions, for example undiscovered pool sizes, against a regional geoscience dataset. The discovery process results agree well with geoscience constraints, but the initial volumetric assessment must be restricted to predict undiscovered pool sizes consistent with the geoscience dataset. Our analysis illustrates advantages and potential pitfalls for volumetric and discovery process assessments and shows that cross-validation between methods and against available data constrains resource potentials and improves confidence in result.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Geological Society, London, Memoirs

Arctic Petroleum Geology

Anthony M. Spencer
Anthony M. Spencer
Statoil, Norway
Search for other works by this author on:
Ashton F. Embry
Ashton F. Embry
Geological Survey of Canada, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Donald L. Gautier
Donald L. Gautier
United States Geological Survey, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Antonina V. Stoupakova
Antonina V. Stoupakova
Moscow State University, Russia
Search for other works by this author on:
Kai Sørensen
Kai Sørensen
Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
Search for other works by this author on:
Geological Society of London
Volume
35
ISBN electronic:
9781862394100
Publication date:
January 01, 2011

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal