Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Growth patterns of noetiid ligaments: implications of developmental models for the origin of an evolutionary novelty among arcoid bivalves

By
R. D. K. Thomas
R. D. K. Thomas
1
Department of Geosciences, Franklin & Marshall College, Lancaster, Pennsylvania 17604-3003, USA (e-mail: r_thomas@acad.fandm.edu)
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Madzvamuse
A. Madzvamuse
2
Computing Laboratory, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QD, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
P. K. Maini
P. K. Maini
3
Centre for Mathematical Biology, Mathematical Institute, 24-29 St Giles’, Oxford OX1 3LB, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
A. J. Wathen
A. J. Wathen
2
Computing Laboratory, Wolfson Building, Parks Road, Oxford 0X1 3QD, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2000

Abstract

The dorsal ligaments of arcoid bivalves typically consist of oblique, lamellar and fibrous sheets, alternating along the hinge so that their attachments form characteristic chevron patterns. New elements are added at or near the middle of the pattern, as the ligament grows ventrally and gets longer. Most Palaeozoic arcoids exhibit this growth pattern, which still predominates among their living descendants. Early in the Cretaceous, a novel pattern emerged, with vertical strips of lamellar ligament embedded in grooves in the sheet of fibrous ligament which is attached to each valve. In contrast with the chevron, duplivincular ligament, new elements are added to each end of the noetiid ligament, anteriorly and posteriorly. This distinctive growth pattern is the defining character of the family Noetiidae.

Remarkable variation among individuals within populations of a living limopsid arcoid includes forms with vertical strips of lamellar ligament. These variants suggest how the noetiid growth pattern could have been derived from the duplivincular pattern. Computer simulations show that such patterns can be generated by a reaction–diffusion mechanism of the sort first conceived by Turing (1952, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, Series B, 237, 37–72). Moreover, the noetiid growth pattern can simply be derived from the duplivincular pattern by a developmental switch based, for example, on a change in boundary conditions. These results indicate that striking differences in form may arise from modest changes in the developmental process. The evolution of the Noetiidae, members of which are quite disparate in overall shell form, should be reassessed. The derived character on which this family is based may not be uniquely shared, so the group could well be polyphyletic.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

Geological Society, London, Special Publications

The Evolutionary Biology of the Bivalvia

E. M. Harper
E. M. Harper
Cambridge University, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
J. D. Taylor
J. D. Taylor
The Natural History Museum, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
J. A. Crame
J. A. Crame
British Antarctic Survey, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Geological Society of London
Volume
177
ISBN electronic:
9781862394254
Publication date:
January 01, 2000

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal