Disposal of radioactive liquid wastes poses a particularly vexing problem, because these wastes contain various radionuclides and chemicals used in processing operations which are potentially dangerous, even in low radionuclide concentrations. Sorptive properties of minerals, particularly ion-exchange reactions, have been studied for potential direct application in waste treatment and for the purpose of defining the fate of radionuclides when released to soils and geologic formations.
Because most waste streams normally contain stable-ion concentrations far in excess of radioactive ions, sorption reactions of interest are those which exhibit high selectivity for the radionuclides. Structural and/or steric factors are generally of highest significance in selective reactions. Micaceous minerals selectively sorb radiocesium from high-sodium, aluminum, or calcium solutions, primarily because of favorable structure. Zeolitic minerals show selectivity for certain ions by excluding other ions whose sizes exceed lattice parameters. Some sorbents show selective sorption reactions under particular pH conditions; thus, alumina and related hydrous oxides selectively sorb radioactive cobalt and radiostrontium in alkaline sodium systems. In addition to the exchange reactions, sorbent properties, such as flocculation, swelling, and absorption of liquids, and chemical properties of radionuclides are important considerations in waste-disposal operations and management.
In practical applications of the sorptive phenomena in waste disposal, if is necessary to know the solution characteristics, sorbent properties, and formation char-acteristics, as well as fhe interactions of these factors. In the hydraulic-fracturing technique employed at Oak Ridge, the waste-solution characteristics influence the choice of sorbents used to prepare waste-cement slurries. The high-sodium salt concentration requires attapulgite instead of bentonite, and illite is added to fix radioactive cesium. To immobilize the mix after injection underground, cement is added, but the cement further complicates the reactions and behavior of the clay slurries. The behavior during injection and ultimate setting of the grout is further influenced by the char-acteristics of the formation.
Each underground-disposal operation will require understanding of the environment into which the waste is to be placed. The final facility and technique should be tailored to meet fhe requirements of maintaining safe operation and insuring long-term safety for future generations.
Figures & Tables
Underground Waste Management and Environmental Implications
This publication consists of papers based on oral presentations at a symposium of the same name co-sponsored by the United States Geological Survey and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. A wide range of technical issues are covered, as well as regulatory and liability concerns. Documentation of two areas in Colorado where earthquakes had resulted from subsurface fluid injection set the stage for modern debates regarding possible similar results elsewhere. A wide range of fluid compositions are subject to subsurface waste disposal. The largest volumes are brines separated during the production of oil and gas wells, but acid-water and industrial wastes of all types can be disposed in significant quantities in local areas. Large hydraulic fracture treatments never recover all of the injected fluids, and the chemical additives in the fluid that remains underground can be a concern. The subsurface injection of radioactive waste is a topic for three of the papers. The possible need for sequestration of carbon dioxide was not a significant concern at the time and was not covered, but many of the papers provide insight into the issues related to modern proposals. When fluids are injected under pressure into subsurface aquifers, they interact in numerous ways. The fluids can potentially migrate for long distances and potentially interfere with other uses for the native aquifer fluids. If the aquifer cannot transport all of the fluids away, the buildup in pressure can cause fracturing of the rock. Differences in composition between the injected and native fluids can cause chemical reactions to occur; in some cases these can be desirable in that they can immobilize certain solutes in mineral form. The long-term environmental consequences are a common theme in many of the papers because of the recognition that the disposed fluids would become a permanent fixture in subsurface aquifers and could have long-term consequences for their future utilization.