Deep-Well Acid Disposal—Planning and Completion1
Published:January 01, 1972
Because of fhe magnitude of damage wrought to our natural resources, pollution control and environmental protection are a vital part of our everyday living. Pollution of air, land, and surface water has led to the use of subsurface disposal (storage) of waste effluents. The federal government and the individual states are continually passing new laws governing deep-well disposal. Feasibility studies are mandatory and must include an analysis of fhe disposal reservoirs and a detailed geologic study to determine the presence of faults or abandoned wells that could be a source of contamination of potable waters.
Many of the cementing procedures used in the oil industry are also used in disposal wells; however, added precautions must be taken in the design of the casing and injection strings. These precautions include the use of materials that are resistant to chemical attack, such as special alloys and fiberglass. Oil-well cements may be used in wells where the effluent is organic—e.g., weak organic acids, sewage waste, ferric chloride, and chemically treated effluents having a pH of 6 or above. A formulation of cement and liquid resin will resist attack from dilute acid solutions. The latest development in resin compositions is a blend of epoxy resin and an inert filler. This resin system has shown considerable promise for use in cementing disposal wells. It is resistant to concentrated acidic and caustic effluents and provides excellent bonding properties to the tubular goods.
Figures & Tables
Underground Waste Management and Environmental Implications
This publication consists of papers based on oral presentations at a symposium of the same name co-sponsored by the United States Geological Survey and the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. A wide range of technical issues are covered, as well as regulatory and liability concerns. Documentation of two areas in Colorado where earthquakes had resulted from subsurface fluid injection set the stage for modern debates regarding possible similar results elsewhere. A wide range of fluid compositions are subject to subsurface waste disposal. The largest volumes are brines separated during the production of oil and gas wells, but acid-water and industrial wastes of all types can be disposed in significant quantities in local areas. Large hydraulic fracture treatments never recover all of the injected fluids, and the chemical additives in the fluid that remains underground can be a concern. The subsurface injection of radioactive waste is a topic for three of the papers. The possible need for sequestration of carbon dioxide was not a significant concern at the time and was not covered, but many of the papers provide insight into the issues related to modern proposals. When fluids are injected under pressure into subsurface aquifers, they interact in numerous ways. The fluids can potentially migrate for long distances and potentially interfere with other uses for the native aquifer fluids. If the aquifer cannot transport all of the fluids away, the buildup in pressure can cause fracturing of the rock. Differences in composition between the injected and native fluids can cause chemical reactions to occur; in some cases these can be desirable in that they can immobilize certain solutes in mineral form. The long-term environmental consequences are a common theme in many of the papers because of the recognition that the disposed fluids would become a permanent fixture in subsurface aquifers and could have long-term consequences for their future utilization.