Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Sedimentology and Petrophysical Character of Cretaceous Marine Shale Sequences in Foreland Basins—Potential Seismic Response Issues

By
W. R. Almon
W. R. Almon
Chevron Texaco Inc., Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
E. Rietsch
E. Rietsch
Chevron Texaco Inc., Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Wm. C. Dawson
Wm. C. Dawson
Chevron Texaco Inc., Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
S. J. Sutton
S. J. Sutton
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
F. G. Ethridge
F. G. Ethridge
Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
B. Castelblanco-Torres
B. Castelblanco-Torres
Chevron Texaco Inc., Bakersfield, California, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2005

Abstract

Development of predictive models to estimate the distribution and petrophysical properties of potential mudstone-flow barriers can reduce risks inherent to exploration and exploitation programs. Such a predictive model, founded in sequence stratigraphy, requires calibration with outcrop and subsurface analogs. Detailed sedimentological, petrophysical, and geochemical analyses of Lewis Shale (lower Maastrichtian) samples from southeast Wyoming reveal considerable variability in petrophysically and seismically significant rock properties. Lower Lewis strata represent late-stage transgressive deposits that include a distinctive condensed interval. The overlying progradational Lewis interval consists mostly of interstratified very silty shales and argillaceous siltstones. High-frequency sheet and lenticular sandstone bodies occur in the progradational Lewis package. Sealing capacity, as measured by mercury injection-capillary pressure (MICP) analysis, varies with fabric, texture, and compositional factors that are related to sequence-stratigraphic position. Samples from the Lewis Shale transgressive interval have significantly greater MICP values (average 18,000 psia) and are markedly better seals relative to samples from the overlying Lewis Shale progradational package (average 3000 psia). Transgressive shales with enhanced sealing capacity are characterized by higher total organic carbon and hydrogen index values, lower permeability, and lower detrital silt content. These transgressive shales are enriched in iron-bearing clay minerals and authigenic pyrite. Greater shear wave velocities, larger shear moduli, and higher bulk density also characterize transgressive Lewis Shales. The most promising seal horizons are laterally extensive, silt-poor, pyritic shales occurring in the uppermost transgressive systems tract. Stacking patterns of slow and fast shale horizons can yield seismic responses comparable to those interpreted as hydrocarbon-bearing reservoirs.

You do not currently have access to this article.
Don't already have an account? Register

Figures & Tables

Contents

AAPG Hedberg Series

Evaluating Fault and Cap Rock Seals

Peter Boult
Peter Boult
Search for other works by this author on:
John Kaldi
John Kaldi
Search for other works by this author on:
American Association of Petroleum Geologists
Volume
2
ISBN electronic:
9781629810423
Publication date:
January 01, 2005

GeoRef

References

Related

A comprehensive resource of eBooks for researchers in the Earth Sciences

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal