Predicting Coastal Depositional Style: Influence of Basin Morphology and Accommodation to Sediment Supply Ratio within a Sequence Stratigraphic Framework
R. Bruce Ainsworth, Stephen S. Flint, John A. Howell, 2008. "Predicting Coastal Depositional Style: Influence of Basin Morphology and Accommodation to Sediment Supply Ratio within a Sequence Stratigraphic Framework", Recent Advances in Models of Siliciclastic Shallow-Marine Stratigraphy, Gray J. Hampson, Ronald J. Steel, Peter M. Burgess, Robert W. Dalrymple
Download citation file:
The Middle Jurassic succession in the Sunrise and Troubadour gas-condensate fields (Bonaparte Basin, Timor Sea, Australia, and Timor Leste) is represented by marginal marine strata that were deposited in either fluvial-dominated or wave-dominated, but pervasively tide-influenced coastal environments. The core, biostratigraphic, and wireline log data allow the 225-m-thick succession to be broken down into 9 facies associations that are arranged into 6 third-order sequences, 12 systems tracts, and 24 parasequences. Vertical changes in depositional style are recognized within the sequence stratigraphic framework and are related to fluctuations in relative sea level, variations in the effectiveness of fluvial and wave energy, accommodation to sediment supply ratio (A/S), and basin morphology.
The study indicates that there are direct relationships between the A/S ratio, basin morphology, and the dominant character of the preserved depositional systems. When A/S ratios were high, typical in transgressive and early highstand systems tracts (steeply rising shoreline trajectories), sedimentation rates were too low to fill all the space that was created and the underlying basin morphology became the overriding factor in determining coastline geometry and hence the dominant sedimentation style. The coastline became more embayed and protected from wave energy, such that the depositional systems that evolved were fluvial-dominated. During periods of lower A/S ratios, typical in late highstand or lowstand systems tracts (slightly rising or flat shoreline trajectories), or during periods of accommodation reduction typical in falling-stage systems tracts (falling shoreline trajectories), the sedimentation rate kept pace with or exceeded the rate of accommodation development. Hence, the underlying basin geometry became less important as the basin was rapidly infilled and the coastlines became less embayed and more open to the direct influence of wave energy. These shorelines were therefore wave-dominated.
The depositional trend of switching from fluvial-dominated, tide-influenced deposits to wave-dominated, tide-influenced deposits in response to decreasing A/S ratios on a deposystem scale is repeated at a larger, sequence-set scale and appears to be related to a lower- order (second-order) decrease in A/S ratios and its consequent impact on paleomorphology. The persistent tidal influence throughout the succession is attributed to the embayed nature of the Bonaparte Basin during the Middle Jurassic.
A model to predict dominant and subordinate coastal depositional processes related to variability in fluvial and wave effectiveness, and a range of basin morphologies in low-A/S and high-A/S regimes is presented. The relationships between these parameters are broadly scale invariant, hence the models can be used to predict alongshore variations in coastal depositional style and vertical-deposystem-scale and sequence-set-scale changes in process dominance.
Figures & Tables
Recent Advances in Models of Siliciclastic Shallow-Marine Stratigraphy
Siliciclastic shallow-marine deposits record the interface between land and sea, and its response to a variety of forcing mechanisms: physical process regime, the internal dynamics of coastal and shelfal depositional systems, relative sea level, sediment flux, tectonic setting, and climate. These deposits have long been the subject of conceptual stratigraphic models that seek to explain the interplay between these various forcing mechanisms, and their preservation in the stratigraphic record. This volume arose from an SEPM research conference on shoreline–shelf stratigraphy that was held in Grand Junction, Colorado, on August 24–28, 2004. The aim of the resulting volume is to highlight the development over the last 15 years of the stratigraphic concepts and models that are used to interpret siliciclastic marginal-marine, shallow-marine, and shelf deposits.