Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Shelf and Shelf-Margin Growth in Scenarios of Rising and Falling Sea Level

By
Ronald J. Steel
Ronald J. Steel
Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, U. S. A. e-mail: rsteel@mail. utexas. edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Cristian Carvajal
Cristian Carvajal
Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, U. S. A. e-mail: rsteel@mail. utexas. edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew L. Petter
Andrew L. Petter
Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, U. S. A. e-mail: rsteel@mail. utexas. edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Carlos Uroza
Carlos Uroza
Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712, U. S. A. e-mail: rsteel@mail. utexas. edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2008

Abstract

The topset and slope components of aggrading and accreting shelf-margin prisms, and the role of deltas in margin growth, are reviewed. Shelves are constructed by the repeated regressive-transgressive transits of deltas and other shoreline systems on the shelf platform, and when these sediment-delivery systems reach the edge of a preexisting shelf there may be significant accretion of the margin. Regressing deltas/strandplains and transgressing estuaries/barriers can be variably influenced by waves, tides, or river currents, and the presence/distribution of these processes can change in space and time on the shelf platform, and sometimes systematically in cross-shelf transits. The modeled transit time for modern deltas that are able to cross their shelves completely is surprisingly short, usually less than 100 ky. The separation between deltas that are unable or are able to make the entire transit when sea level is rising moderately (2. 1 m/ky) allows accommodation-dominated delivery systems (those that require sea-level fall to force the cross-shelf transit) and supply-dominated systems (those that can cross the shelf even with rising sea level) to be distinguished. These end-member systems, in turn, become important in the rationale for arguing a distinction between the conventional falling (lowstand) relative sea-level model for shelf-margin growth and turbidite accumulations, and a model that delivers deepwater sands with normal regression and rising relative sea level at the shelf margin. The differing deepwater architectures for these two models are outlined.

You do not currently have access to this article.
Don't already have an account? Register

Figures & Tables

Contents

SEPM Special Publication

Recent Advances in Models of Siliciclastic Shallow-Marine Stratigraphy

Gray J. Hampson
Gray J. Hampson
Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Ronald J. Steel
Ronald J. Steel
Department of Geosciences, Jackson School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter M. Burgess
Peter M. Burgess
Shell International Exploration and Production, Kessler Park 1, P.O. Box 60, 2280 AB Rijswijk, The NetherlandsPresent address: Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert W. Dalrymple
Robert W. Dalrymple
Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
Volume
90
ISBN electronic:
9781565763180
Publication date:
January 01, 2008

GeoRef

References

Related

A comprehensive resource of eBooks for researchers in the Earth Sciences

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal