Chapter 10 Middle and Upper Magdalena Basins, Colombia
Published:January 01, 1991
The Magdalena River flows northward across the Colombian Andes traversing a series of en echelon, sediment-filled structural de- pressions. The Magdalena basins resist easy classification in that, until the late Miocene, they have been parts of much more extensive basins: an extensional, back-arc basin during the Triassic-Jurassic; a pericratonic trough during the Cretaceous and early Tertiary; the inner margin of a broad, east-facing foreland trough during the mid-Tertiary; and more recently an array of intermontaine or “successor” basins. The geologic character of the Magdalena basins is tied intimately to that of the bordering Central and Eastern Cordilleras. Since 1918, there has been nearly continuous exploration activity in the Magdalena basins resulting in the discovery of more than 2.6 billion barrels of oil (GBO) and 2.7 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of gas—more than half of the total oil and about a third of the total gas reserves of the country. As of the end of 1989, the daily production from the basins averaged 143,432 bbl of oil and 182.8 mcf of gas.
The abundant hydrocarbon resources of the Magdalena basins are based on the presence of a thick, organic-rich limestone and shale succession (La Luna or Villeta) deposited in an extensive pericratonic trough along the northwest margin of the Guyana shield during the Cretaceous. In the south, nearer the paleogeo- graphic margin of the trough, shallow-marine sandstones (Caballos and Monserrate) bounding the Cretaceous marine megacycle are the prime reservoirs. To the north, nearer the axis of the trough, Cretaceous sandstone reservoirs are absent and production is almost exclusively from mid-Tertiary molasse deposits. The Magdalena basins contain a wide variety of structural and stratigraphic traps, most developed during or prior to peak of maturation of the Cretaceous source beds. Recent discoveries of
giant oil accumulations, such as the San Francisco field, were made in large, hanging-wall anticlines previously considered breached and unproductive. The testing of deeper reservoirs and new structural concepts during the 1980s have resulted in many important discoveries. From the standpoint of hydrocarbon exploration and exploitation, the Magdalena basins are not yet “mature.” The potential for additional major discoveries is excellent and certaini. i. that with improved production techniques current estimates of remaining ultimately recoverable reserves in the producing fields will be revised upward.
Figures & Tables
Active Margin Basins
“The most distinctive characteristic of the Los Angeles basin“The most distinctive characteristic of the Los Angeles basin is its structural relief and complexity in relation to its age and size” (Yerkes et aI., 1965, p. AI6); however, its very complexity caused no small amount of discussion in designing and naming this volume of the AAPG World Petroleum Basin Memoirs. (See the Foreword for a discussion of the scope of these memoirs.) The series coordinators decided early that the Los Angeles basin should be included in the World Petroleum Basins project because of its interesting geology and importance as a hydrocarbon producer. Initially, the Los Angeles basin was considered for a convergent-margin volume, presumably in recognition of the late-stage shortening that has taken place in the Los Angeles region of southern California. There is little doubt, however, that the Los Angeles basin has formed and deformed within the evolving San Andreas transform system (Atwater, 1970, 1989; Campbell and Yerkes, 1976; Blake et al., 1978; Engebretson et al., 1985; Wright, this volume). There is also little doubt among those who have worked in the area that the initial subsidence of the Neogene Los Angeles basin was caused by extension (Yeats, 1968; Crowell, 1974, 1976, 1987; Wright, this volume). The series coordinators decided, therefore, that to portray the Los Angeles basin as a model for basins formed in convergent-margin settings would be misleading.
The title of this volume, Active Margin Basins, is a compromise, but, like many compromises, this title falls short of completely describing its subject