Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Evaluation of Field Development Plans Using 3-D Reservoir Modeling

By
D. Seifert
D. Seifert
Heriot-Watt UniversityEdinburgh, Scotland
Search for other works by this author on:
J.D.H Newbery
J.D.H Newbery
Conoco (U.K.) Ltd.Aberdeen, Scotland
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Ramsey
C. Ramsey
Conoco (U.K.) Ltd.Aberdeen, Scotland
Search for other works by this author on:
J.J.M. Lewis
J.J.M. Lewis
Heriot-Watt UniversityEdinburgh, Scotland
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 1999

Abstract

Three-dimensional reservoir modeling has become an accepted tool in reservoir description and is used for various purposes, such as reservoir per-formance prediction or integration and visualization of data. In this case study, a small northern North Sea turbiditic reservoir was to be developed with a line-drive strategy utilizing a series of horizontal producer and injector pairs, oriented north-south. This development plan was to be evaluated and the expected outcome of the wells was to be assessed and risked.

Detailed analyses of core, well log, and analog data have led to the development of two geological end member scenarios, thus accounting for uncertainties associated with the geological model. Both scenarios have been modeled using the sequential indicator simulation method in a hybrid deterministic-stochastic approach. The resulting equiprobable realizations have been subjected to detailed statistical well placement optimization and analysis techniques. Based upon bivariate statistical evaluation of more than 1000 numerical well trajectories for each of the two scenarios, it was found that the inclinations and lengths of the wells had a greater impact on the wells' success, whereas the azimuth was found to have only a minor impact. After integration of these results, the actual well paths were redesigned to meet external drilling constraints, resulting in substantial reductions in drilling time and costs.

Although three development wells drilled subsequent to this study were very successful, their outcome raises questions about the validity of the stochastic model, which is based on geological assumptions which, in turn, were derived from much fewer well data. It is clear that a better quantitative sedimentological understanding of the reservoir, specifically in the lateral dimension, would have resulted in a more reliable reservoir model.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

AAPG Memoir

Reservoir Characterization—Recent Advances

Richard A. Schatzinger
Richard A. Schatzinger
Search for other works by this author on:
John F. Jordan
John F. Jordan
Search for other works by this author on:
American Association of Petroleum Geologists
Volume
71
ISBN electronic:
9781629810720
Publication date:
January 01, 1999

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

A comprehensive resource of eBooks for researchers in the Earth Sciences

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal