Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Attributes of a Large Underpressured Gas System, San Juan Basin, New Mexico

By
Philip H. Nelson
Philip H. Nelson
U.S. Geological Survey
,
Denver, Colorado
,
U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Steven M. Condon
Steven M. Condon
U.S. Geological Survey
,
Denver, Colorado
,
U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2008

Abstract

Large quantities of natural gas have been produced from underpressured Cretaceous reservoirs of the San Juan Basin since 1951, yet the reasons for the under-pressuring and the containment mechanisms remain a subject of inquiry. In this investigation, compilations of reservoir pressures from the 1950s and early 1960s are used to minimize the perturbations caused by later gas production. The pressures are projected to two basin-scale cross sections showing the structural configuration and stratigraphy of Cretaceous and younger rock units. Gas pressures in the Dakota Sandstone vary according to location, with pressure/depth ratios of 0.36 psi/ft (8.16 kPa/m) in the west and 0.41 psi/ft (9.27 kPa/m) in the east, where pressures approach hydrostatic values. Gas pressures in the sandstones of the Mesaverde Group are remarkably consistent, with pressure/depth ratios of 0.24 psi/ft (5.42 kPa/m), except in the southeast corner of the gas accumulation where the pressure/depth ratio is 0.35 psi/ft (7.91 kPa/m).

Pressure-elevation plots, in conjunction with cross sections and measurements of hydraulic head in water wells, show that the gas system is not buoyant in the way that a conventional gas accumulation is buoyant. Underpressuring in this basin reflects the absence of bottom water and the presence of top water. The pressure reference for the gas is at the edge of the gas accumulation instead of at the bottom, and the preproduction gas pressure is determined by the elevation of the lateral transition from downdip gas to updip water on the southwestern limb and other margins of this asymmetric basin.

No pressure discontinuity between gas and water exists at the updip edge of the gas accumulation; hence, no seal in the usual sense exists, and there is no need for one. The hard seal of a shale or an evaporite formation is replaced by a capillary soft seal caused by a transition from low-permeability downdip rocks to high-permeability updip rocks.

Hydrodynamic trapping, an explanation that has been cited for many years, is not required. Instead, the gas is just sitting in a pancake-shaped volume bounded by a low-permeability base, a gentle stratigraphic rise on one side, and more steeply dipping monoclines on the other three sides. The gas does not escape from the edges of the basin because no excess gas pressure can exist in the absence of an underlying aquifer.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

AAPG Hedberg Series

Understanding, Exploring, and Developing Tight-gas Sands

S. P. Cumella
S. P. Cumella
Bill Barrett Corporation
,
Denver, Colorado
,
U.S.A
.
Search for other works by this author on:
K. W. Shanley
K. W. Shanley
Discovery Group
,
Denver, Colorado
,
U.S.A
.
Search for other works by this author on:
W. K. Camp
W. K. Camp
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation
,
The Woodlands, Texas
,
U.S.A
.
Search for other works by this author on:
American Association of Petroleum Geologists
Volume
3
ISBN electronic:
9781629810324
Publication date:
January 01, 2008

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal