Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Inversion and Interpretation of Impedance Data

By
Rebecca B. Latimer
Rebecca B. Latimer
Chevron U.S.A.
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2011

Since the early to mid-1980s, inversion has been in discussion. Inversion is defined by Sheriff in his dictionary of geophysics terms as “Deriving from field data a model to describe the subsurface that is consistent with the data”(Sheriff, 2002, p. 194). My first exposure was at Amoco when I heard this topic discussed by Roy Lindseth. An excellent history of the topic is given in Lindseth (1979). The term inversion has always seemed to mean different things to different people. It also seemed to evoke very strong comments based on individuals’ experiences on the topic. I was recently told that a “constrained sparse-spike inversion algorithm” was simply nothing more than a phase rotation of the seismic. When I mentioned the parameters that went into this type of algorithm, the individual did not want to discuss it because it did not support his argument against utilizing the process. I am forever amazed at how much confusion there still is and at how people can be so completely confused in their very definitive statements. In 2000, I wrote an article in the Society of Exploration Geophysicists’ The Leading Edge in an effort to present a guide to the interpreters who use inverted data (Latimer et al., 2000). A lot has happened since 2000, and it is time to update the interpreter community with added details and further explanations, which are featured in this chapter. I will expand the discussion from simply post-stack seismic-trace inversion to include pre-stack data and geostatistical inversion. I will provide a description of terminology and again a basis for comparison and usage of acoustic-impedance inversion products, and I will give the interpreter a methodology for quality control and interpretation of inverted data.

I still contend, as I did in 2000, that the first and foremost prerequisite in doing any type of inversion is to have the absolute best seismic processing completed prior to attempting an inversion. I will show, however, that a post-stack inverted data set may help you determine whether the data should be reprocessed, thereby indicating that it can sometimes also be used as a screening tool for further work.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

AAPG Memoir

Interpretation of Three-Dimensional Seismic Data

Alistair R. Brown
Alistair R. Brown
Consulting Reservoir Geophysicist
Search for other works by this author on:
American Association of Petroleum Geologists
Volume
42
ISBN electronic:
9781629810034
Publication date:
January 01, 2011

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal