Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Tuning Phenomena in Reservoirs

January 01, 2011


Widess (1973) demonstrated the interaction of closely-spaced reflections. In his classic paper, “How thin is a thin bed?,” he discussed the effect of bed thickness on seismic signature. For a bed thickness of the order of a seismic wavelength or greater there is little or no interference between the wavelets from the top and the bottom of the bed and each is recorded without modification. For thinner beds these wavelets interfere both constructively and destructively. Considering wavelets of opposite polarity, the amplitude of the composite wavelet reaches a maximum for a bed thickness of one-quarter wavelength (one-half period) and this is known as the tuning thickness. For beds thinner than this the shape of the composite wavelet stays the same but its amplitude decreases. Clearly, the bed thicknesses at which these phenomena occur depend on the shape of the wavelet in the data and hence on its frequency content.

These tuning phenomena are of considerable importance to the stratigraphic interpreter. They must be recognized as effects of bed geometry as opposed to variations in the acoustic properties of the medium. Figure 6-1 shows a sedimentary pod. As the reflections from the top and the base come together (within the black square) the amplitude abruptly increases; this is interpreted as tuning between the top and base reflections.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables


AAPG Memoir

Interpretation of Three-Dimensional Seismic Data

Alistair R. Brown
Alistair R. Brown
Consulting Reservoir Geophysicist
Search for other works by this author on:
American Association of Petroleum Geologists
ISBN electronic:
Publication date:
January 01, 2011




Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal