Comparison between the Different Approaches of Secondary and Tertiary Hydrocarbon Migration Modeling in Basin Simulator
Published:January 01, 2012
Sylvie Pegaz-Fiornet, Carpentier Bernard, Michel Anthony, Sylvie Wolf, 2012. "Comparison between the Different Approaches of Secondary and Tertiary Hydrocarbon Migration Modeling in Basin Simulator", Basin Modeling: New Horizons in Research and Applications, Kenneth E. Peters, David J. Curry, Marek Kacewicz
Download citation file:
Two major techniques are commonly used to model secondary and tertiary hydrocarbon migration: Darcy flow and invasion percolation. These approaches differ from each other in many ways, most notably in the physical modeling, the methods of resolution, and the type of results obtained. The Darcy approach involves not only buoyancy, capillary pressures, and pressure gradient, but also transient physics, thanks to the viscous terms. Although it can be numerically difficult and therefore time consuming, it is appropriate for slow hydrocarbon movement and it is able to provide a good description of cap-rock leakage. The invasion percolation approach, at least in the context of the implementation used in our examples, does not consider either viscosity or permeability; only buoyancy and capillary pressures drive the hydrocarbon migration. This method is relatively quick and especially useful to simulate secondary migration. Nevertheless, the viscous terms cannot be universally neglected as they can impact the timing of trap filling.
Figures & Tables
Basin Modeling: New Horizons in Research and Applications
Temperature-time–based first-order kinetic models are currently used to predict hydrocarbon generation and maturation in basin modeling. Physical chemical theory, however, indicates that water pressure should exert significant control on the extent of these hydrocarbon generation and maturation reactions. We previously heated type II Kimmeridge Clay source rock in the range of 310 to 350°C at a water pressure of 500 bar to show that pressure retarded hydrocarbon generation. This study extended a previous study on hydrocarbon generation from the Kimmeridge Clay that investigated the effects of temperature in the range of 350 to 420°C at water pressures as much as 500 bar and for periods of 6, 12, and 24 hr. Although hydrocarbon generation reactions at temperatures of 420°C are controlled mostly by the high temperature, pressure is found to have a significant effect on the phase and the amounts of hydrocarbons generated.
In addition to hydrocarbon yields, this study also includes the effect of temperature, time, and pressure on maturation. Water pressure of 390 bar or higher retards the vitrinite reflectance by an average of ca. 0.3% Ro compared with the values obtained under low pressure hydrous conditions across the temperature range investigated. Temperature, pressure, and time all control the vitrinite reflectance. Therefore, models to predict hydrocarbon generation and maturation in geological basins must include pressure in the kinetic models used to predict the extent of these reactions.