Skip to Main Content


Two reservoir quality assessment case studies (Kekiktuk Formation sandstones and Yacheng field) have been discussed in preceding chapters (Chapters 4 and 8). The Yacheng reservoir quality prediction model was based on a calibration data set from wells with similar temperature and effective pressure histories. As a result of these similarities, reservoir quality was simply a function of depositionally-controlled differences in composition, sorting, and grain size. In contrast, reservoir quality in the Kekiktuk Formation sandstone was controlled primarily by texture (grain size) and burial history.

In this chapter, three more case studies are discussed (Middle Jurassic sandstones of the Fangst group, offshore mid-Norway; Late Cretaceous-Late Eocene sandstones in the Taranaki basin, New Zealand; and Middle Eocene-Late Oligocene sandstones of the San Emigdio area, California). The reservoir quality of compositionally- and texturally-similar sandstones from the Haltenbanken area (offshore mid-Norway) is controlled by their burial history. In sandstones of the Taranaki Basin (New Zealand), the key to successful porosity prediction is understanding burial diagenetic processes and, in particular, proper evaluation of the importance of secondary porosity. Finally, a case study from the southernmost San Joaquin basin illustrates an approach to predicting porosity in sandstones with a wide range of zeolite and clay cement abundances.

You do not currently have access to this chapter.

Figures & Tables





Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal