Skip to Main Content

Abstract

If, as suggested by numerous workers, hydrocarbon emplacement can significantly retard at least some diagenetic processes, it becomes important to quantify the influence of this variable on reservoir quality. Measurement of the effects of hydrocarbon emplacement on porosity can be accomplished using two different approaches. The simplest of these is to use present-day hydrocarbon saturations. The other approach involves reconstruction of hydrocarbon saturations from the point at which they are emplaced to the present.

Present-day saturations can be obtained in several ways. The first is by direct measurement on unextracted sidewall, conventional core, or preserved core samples. Due to the effects of drilling mud invasion and mud filtrate flushing, fluid saturations in sidewall core samples may differ significantly from in situ values. A second method involves the use of resistivity logs (for examples of this method, see Asquith, 1982). As was the case with core samples, logs may also be affected by drilling mud filtrate flushing in the near-wellbore zone. A third method is to conduct capillary pressure analyses on rotary sidewall or core samples. Knowing distance above the free-water level in the reservoir (assuming one is present), and properties of the reservoir fluids, an estimate of the hydrocarbon saturation at the depth of the sample analyzed can be obtained from a capillary pressure curve. An example of the use of the capillary pressure method of estimating saturations is given in Monicard (1980).

An understanding of saturation history is essential to an accurate assessment of the relative importance of hydrocarbon

You do not currently have access to this chapter.

Figures & Tables

Contents

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal