Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination


The usefulness of geochemical modeling in diagenesis lies in the ability to analyze processes that cannot be measured directly in the laboratory, either due to the time element (slow kinetics) or, more typically, metastable equilibria. Important diagenetic process include: albitization (Morad and others, 1990), the illite/smectite transition (Perry and Hower, 1970; Bjørlykke and Aagaard, 1992), zeolitization, development of quartz overgrowths, carbonate cementation (Boles, 1979; Bjørlykke, 1983; Bjørlykke and others, 1989), the role of calcium-plagioclase and other unstable minerals in driving diagenetic reactions (Boles, 1991; Ram-seyer and others, 1992), and the effects of fluid composition on the final diagenetic state. Computer modeling of these processes has reached the stage that it can perform fairly realistic "what if” experiments in which the investigator has control of all pertinent variables and can examine the results from a number of perspectives.

All of the reactions mentioned above can be occurring separately or simultaneously, and the models have now reached a state of sophistication that they will accurately keep a mass balance and insure that chemical equilibrium is maintained at all points along the reaction path. At present, there is no other way to dissect these complex and effect relationships other than by invoking the so-called “PATH” models or their variants. They are powerful tools, difficult to master and prone to abuse, but overall constitute a tool for the study of diagenesis that rivals X-rays diffraction analysis and petrographic analysis.

You do not currently have access to this chapter.

Figures & Tables





Citing Books via

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal