Skip to Main Content
Book Chapter

Outcrop-Based GPR Tomography Through Braided-Stream Deposits

By
Ginny L. Rust
Ginny L. Rust
Search for other works by this author on:
Gary S. Weissman
Gary S. Weissman
Search for other works by this author on:
Ulrike Werban
Ulrike Werban
Search for other works by this author on:
Jedediah D. Frechette
Jedediah D. Frechette
Search for other works by this author on:
Timothy F. Wawrzyniec
Timothy F. Wawrzyniec
Search for other works by this author on:
Published:
January 01, 2011

Abstract

Cross-well or borehole ground-penetrating radar (GPR) tomography is commonly used to map subsurface aquifer heterogeneity; however, the influence of sedimentary architecture and anisotropy on GPR signal transmission is largely unknown. To address uncertainty in GPR tomography interpretation, we developed a method to combine GPR and LIDAR surveying to characterize lateral heterogeneity behind an outcrop of braided-stream deposits. Methods included using black paint to mark a regular grid of GPR shot points on opposing outcrop faces for the transmitter and receiver intervals. A 3D model of the outcrop was then constructed using LIDAR scans to determine distances between shot points. GPR tomography was conducted through the outcrop, and velocity calculations from these data were used for tomographic inversions to determine heterogeneities within the outcrop. We were able to successfully combine GPR shot-points with LIDAR data to calculate distances between transmitter and receiver points, and we were able to see first arrivals through the outcrop. Complications, however, were evident at both short offsets (∼ 3–5 m), when the air wave overprinted the first arrival, and longer offsets (> 8 m) when the signal dissipated before reaching the receiver. Air-time arrivals that were observed compared favorably to model predictions based on LIDAR-derived outcrop geometry, supporting the utility of LIDAR for constructing a digital, 3D outcrop. Furthermore, estimated values of radar velocity for this outcrop of 0.09 to 0.12 m/ns reasonably match known velocities for similar sediment. Had the GPR data acquisition been more successful at this outcrop site, we could have used detailed 3D facies architecture derived from the LIDAR data to assess the influence of sediment heterogeneity and anisotropy on GPR tomographic signals.

You do not currently have access to this article.

Figures & Tables

Contents

SEPM Concepts in Sedimentology and Paleontology

Outcrops Revitalized: Tools, Techniques and Applications

Ole J. Martinsen
Ole J. Martinsen
Statoil Exploration
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrew J. Pulham
Andrew J. Pulham
ESACT
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter D.W. Haughton
Peter D.W. Haughton
University College Dublin
Search for other works by this author on:
Morgan D. Sullivan
Morgan D. Sullivan
Chevron Energy Technology Company
Search for other works by this author on:
SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
Volume
10
ISBN electronic:
9781565763067
Publication date:
January 01, 2011

GeoRef

References

Related

Citing Books via

Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal