Evaluation of Evidence for Glacio-Eustatic Control Over Marine Pennsylvanian Cyclothems in North America and Consideration of Possible Tectonic Effects
Philip H. Heckel, 1994. "Evaluation of Evidence for Glacio-Eustatic Control Over Marine Pennsylvanian Cyclothems in North America and Consideration of Possible Tectonic Effects", Tectonic and Eustatic Controls on Sedimentary Cycles, John M. Dennison, Frank R. Ettensohn
Download citation file:
Pennsylvanian major marine cyclothems in midcontinent North America comprise the sequence: thin transgressive limestone, thin offshore gray to black phosphatic shale, and thick regressive limestone. Typically, the cyclothems are separated from one another by well-developed paleosols across an area of perhaps 500,000 km2 from southern Kansas to Iowa and Nebraska. Southward, the offshore shales extend into the foreland basin of Oklahoma, and the regressive limestones and paleosols grade into deltaic to fluvial clastics derived from the Ouachita detrital source. Texas, Illinois, and Appalachian marine cyclothems are detrital-rich like those in Oklahoma, but appear to be separated by paleosols like those in the northern midcontinent. Because the black phosphatic offshore shales of the midcontinent record sediment-starved, condensed deposition below a thermocline in about 100 m of water, sea-level rise and fall of at least that amount is required over the entire northern midcontinent region to account for the widespread dark shale-paleosol cyclicity. Sparsity to absence of deltas between most cycles on the northern shelf rules out delta shifting as a control over major cyclothem formation there. Continuity of all major cyclothems across both the Forest City basin and adjacent Nemaha uplift rules out local differential tectonics on the northern shelf as a major control. Confinement of all reasonable estimates of cyclothem periods within the Milankovitch band of orbital parameters (20 ky to 400 ky), which controlled Pleistocene glacial fluctuation, points to glacial eustasy as the major control over midcontinent cyclicity. Moreover, only the documented late Quaternary post-glacial rates of sea-level rise significantly greater than 3 mm/yr are sufficient to exceed carbonate accumulation consistently and produce the characteristic thin transgressive limestone overlain by the widespread thin subthermocline black shale in each major cyclothem. Although tectonic subsidence helped provide space for sediment accumulation, tectonic control over cyclothem deposition would require both subsidence and uplift of the midcontinent (or an equally large region) at Milankovitch band frequencies. However, currently developed cyclic tectonic mechanisms that can achieve the required depths repeatedly in a cratonic area act at periods at the very least 5 times greater (2 my+) and at rates of sea-level rise at least 30 times too slowly (maximum of 0.1 mm/yr). Firm biostratigraphic correlation of major midcontinent Upper Pennsylvanian cyclothems with similar depositional cycles in Texas and Illinois allows a strong glacio-eustatic signal to be identified in those regions, with little evidence so far of temporally differential tectonism among them. The lithic differences between carbonate-rich midcontinent cyclothems and detrital-rich cyclothems in Texas, Illinois, and the Appalachians are attributable directly to the greater detrital influx in the latter areas, which could relate as much to appropriate climate and accessibility to detrital provenance as to tectonic activity. Preliminary correlations showing that only certain bundles of major marine transgressions extended into the Appalachian basin suggest that the absence of the others may reflect tectonic uplift there, and that with more definite correlation, a longer-term tectonic signal can be isolated in that area.
Figures & Tables
Tectonic and Eustatic Controls on Sedimentary Cycles
The collected volume begins with a brief perspective by one of the conveners, followed by articles in order of increasing stratigraphic age. Eustatic sea-level changes and tectonic warpings of basins are competing mechanisms for explaining many stratigraphic patterns. The model for sea-level changes should be developed first for a basin, since it is allocyclic and leads to a series of time bands in the strata. The residual effects should then be modeled for tectonic patterns affecting the depositional processes. Doing the reverse limits time constraints on the tectonic warping models and will blur the resolution of detailed time surfaces in the strata. Case histories of situations with both tectonic warping and time surfaces marked by sea-level events will lead to improved interpretations of earth history.