Eustatic and Tectonic Control of Deposition of the Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian Strata of the Central Appalachian Basin
Published:January 01, 1994
Donald R. Chesnut, Jr., 1994. "Eustatic and Tectonic Control of Deposition of the Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian Strata of the Central Appalachian Basin", Tectonic and Eustatic Controls on Sedimentary Cycles, John M. Dennison, Frank R. Ettensohn
Download citation file:
Stratigraphic analysis of the Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian rocks of part of the central Appalachian basin reveals two orders of cycles and one overall trend in the vertical sequence of coal-bearing rocks. The smallest order cycle, the coal-clastic cycle, begins at the top of a major-resource coal bed and is composed of a sequence of shale, siltstone, sandstone, seat rock, and overlying coal bed which, in turn, is overlain by the next coal-clastic sequence.
The major marine-transgression cycle is composed of five to seven coal-clastic cycles and is distinguished by the occurrence of widespread, relatively thick (generally greater than 5 m) marine strata at its base. The Breathitt coarsening-upward trend describes the general upward coarsening of the Middle Pennsylvanian part of the Breathitt Group and includes at least five major marine-transgression cycles.
Chronologic analysis, based on averaging relative age dates determined in previous investigations, provides a duration of 20 my for the deposition of Lower and Middle Pennsylvanian strata of the central Appalachian basin. The eight major marine-transgression cycles that occurred in this interval are calculated to represent an average of 2.5 my each. The average duration of the coal-clastic cycle, in contrast, is calculated to be only about 0.4 my.
The average duration of coal-clastic cycles is of the same order of magnitude (105 yr) as the Milankovitch orbital-eccentricity cycles and matches the 0.4 my second-order eccentricity cycle (Long Earth-Eccentricity cycle). These orbital periodicities are known to modulate glacial stages and glacio-eustatic levels. The calculated periodicities of the coal-clastic cycles can be used to support glacio-eustatic control of the coal-bearing rocks of the Appalachian basin. The 2.5-my periodicity of the major marine-transgression cycle does not match any known orbital or tectonic cycle. The cause of this cycle is unknown, but might represent episodic thrusting in the orogen, propagation of intra-plate stresses, or an unidentified orbital cycle. The Breathitt coarsening-upward trend represents the increasing intensity and proximity of the Alleghanian orogeny.
Figures & Tables
Tectonic and Eustatic Controls on Sedimentary Cycles
The collected volume begins with a brief perspective by one of the conveners, followed by articles in order of increasing stratigraphic age. Eustatic sea-level changes and tectonic warpings of basins are competing mechanisms for explaining many stratigraphic patterns. The model for sea-level changes should be developed first for a basin, since it is allocyclic and leads to a series of time bands in the strata. The residual effects should then be modeled for tectonic patterns affecting the depositional processes. Doing the reverse limits time constraints on the tectonic warping models and will blur the resolution of detailed time surfaces in the strata. Case histories of situations with both tectonic warping and time surfaces marked by sea-level events will lead to improved interpretations of earth history.