We thank Wickham and Moeckel for their discussion and apologize for any misrepresentation of their article (Wickham and Moeckel, 1997). The point that we were trying to make was that, in our article, we determined the strain field required by the restoration. We offer here a few clarifications of our article (Erickson et al., 2000) raised by the discussion. In our determination of strain, finite strain analysis is used and is referred to Eulerian, rotated coordinates. A rotation introduced by this strain exists in addition to the least-squares rotations; this additional rotation was added to the...

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.