It's nice to see work on cross section restoration still being published. Erickson et al. (2000), however, misrepresent a previous publication (Wickham and Moeckel, 1997) by twice claiming that we assumed strain "to be a known input parameter at each point in the cross section" and then dismissing the work from further discussion because "there are many situations in which the strain cannot be measured, either because adequate strain markers are not present or not accessible" (Erickson et al., 2000, p. 235). In fact, we did not assume strain as a necessary input parameter but...

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview
You do not currently have access to this article.