Understanding, Exploring, and Developing Tight-gas Sands

The 2005 Vail Hedberg Conference was convened to gain a better understanding of the tight-gas sand resource life cycle by encouraging a free exchange of cross-disciplinary discussion among leading scientific and engineering experts. The results of the conference have led to improved exploration models and development and completion strategies required to exploit the vast North American tight-gas sand potential and emerging international tight-gas sand plays. This third volume in the AAPG Hedberg Series is recommended for geologists and engineers involved in exploring, developing, and appraising tight-gas sand plays for a comprehensive updated view of this important natural-gas resource.
Tight-gas Sandstone Reservoirs: 25 Years of Searching for “The Answer”
-
Published:January 01, 2008
Abstract
During the past 25 yr, several different tight-gas sandstone reservoirs have been brought into the nation’s productive natural-gas inventory. These include reservoirs of many different ages in many different basinal settings. In this chapter, reservoir discovery and management efforts at select fields in the Silurian Tuscarora, Devonian Oriskany, Pennsylvanian Pottsville and Jackfork, Jurassic Cotton Valley, Cretaceous Frontier and Almond, and Eocene Wilcox sandstones are reviewed, compared, and contrasted. Each of these target reservoirs is unique and both simple and complex. However, from a general understanding of the characteristics and variety of tight-gas reservoirs, a set of common generalities can be developed that may even be developed into rules for discovery.
Although many tight-gas sandstone reservoirs may be classified as continuous-type reservoirs, (i.e., unconventional gas accumulations lacking well-defined field boundaries), tight-gas sandstone reservoirs are complexly subtle, with reservoir properties that are anything but continuous across their extent. Intentional discovery and development of tight-gas sandstone reservoirs requires knowledge, planning, careful execution, flexibility, and patience. A discovery model for the exploration and development of tight-gas sandstone reservoirs is proposed: (1) locate wells within a dry, gas-prone basin or part of the basin to avoid liquid (water, crude oil, or condensate) production, which will hurt gas-production rates; (2) select as intended targets depositionally heterogeneous reservoirs (i.e., channel systems), which are close to organic-rich intervals; (3) target slightly higher-shale-content sandstones instead of lower-shale-content sandstones (quartz arenites) to avoid loss of reservoir storage volume caused by cementation; (4) take advantage of whatever structure there is, and drill as high up on that structure as possible; (5) consider how you plan to manage a fractured, tight-gas reservoir (if fractures are anticipated to be present); (6) try to avoid sandstones with the potential for high water flow and low gas flow; (7) develop a clear petrophysical understanding of the reservoir early in the life of the field; and (8) plan on infill drilling once the initial spacing unit design is approved and implemented.
- Almond Formation
- Appalachians
- basins
- Black Warrior Basin
- Carboniferous
- Cenozoic
- clastic rocks
- Cotton Valley Group
- Cretaceous
- Devonian
- Frontier Formation
- gas sands
- Gulf of Mexico Basin
- Jackfork Group
- Jurassic
- Lower Devonian
- Lower Silurian
- Mesozoic
- North America
- oil and gas fields
- Oriskany Sandstone
- Paleogene
- Paleozoic
- Pennsylvanian
- permeability
- petrography
- petroleum
- petroleum exploration
- Pottsville Group
- reservoir properties
- sandstone
- sedimentary basins
- sedimentary rocks
- Silurian
- Tertiary
- tight sands
- Tuscarora Formation
- United States
- Upper Cretaceous
- Upper Jurassic
- Wilcox Group